FRC 100.005 — Thermodynamic Consistency of the Coherence Field

1. Introduction

Any modification to quantum dynamics must be thermodynamically consistent—it must not permit perpetual motion machines or violate the Second Law. Since FRC introduces a new dynamical variable (the Lambda-field) and a new driving force (the coherence gradient), we must demonstrate that these additions do not create thermodynamic paradoxes.

This paper proves that the FRC dynamics satisfy the Second Law exactly. The "cost" of maintaining or increasing coherence ($d \ln C > 0$) is paid by a corresponding increase in environmental entropy ($dS_{env}$), such that total entropy never decreases.

!Thermodynamic Consistency

2. Entropy-Coherence Coupling

2.1 The Generalized Entropy

We define the total generalized entropy as:

S_total = S_sys + S_env - k* ln C

where $k^$ is the coherence constant (equal to $k_B$ in thermodynamic contexts). The term $-k^ \ln C$ represents the "entropy debt" paid to maintain coherence.

2.2 The Reciprocity Law

From the first principles of FRC (FRC-566-001), we derive:

dS + k* d ln C = 0    (closed system, reversible)

This is the entropy-coherence reciprocity: any increase in coherence requires a compensating decrease in entropy (or vice versa). For irreversible processes:

dS_total = dS_sys + dS_env + k* d ln C >= 0

The inequality ensures the Second Law is always satisfied.

2.3 Physical Interpretation

| Process | $dS$ | $d \ln C$ | Net Effect | |:---|:---|:---|:---| | Measurement (collapse) | Increases | Increases locally | Entropy exported to environment | | Decoherence | Increases | Decreases | Standard 2nd law process | | Phase-locking | Decreases locally | Increases | Balanced by environmental $dS_{env}$ | | Thermal equilibrium | Maximum | Minimum ($C \to 0$) | Ground state of reciprocity |

3. Generalized Free Energy

3.1 Derivation

For an isothermal process, the Helmholtz free energy generalizes to:

F = U - TS + k*T ln C

The equilibrium condition becomes:

dF = 0  =>  dU = T dS - k*T d ln C

This defines a new thermodynamic potential that accounts for coherence.

3.2 The Gibbs-Coherence Relation

At constant pressure and temperature, the Gibbs free energy becomes:

G = H - TS - k*T ln C

The spontaneity condition is:

deltaG = -k*T delta(ln C) < 0

Processes that increase coherence are thermodynamically favorable—they decrease the generalized free energy. This provides a thermodynamic "arrow" pointing toward coherence.

!Free Energy Landscape

4. The Cost of Coherence

4.1 Energy Budget

Maintaining coherence requires energy. The power dissipated to sustain a coherence level $C$ against environmental decoherence is:

P_coherence = k*T * gamma_decoherence * |ln C|

where $\gamma_{decoherence}$ is the decoherence rate. For quantum systems at room temperature, this cost is negligible ($\sim 10^{-20}$ W), but for macroscopic coherence it becomes significant.

4.2 Thermodynamic Limit on Coherence

The maximum achievable coherence at temperature $T$ is bounded by:

C_max = exp(-Delta E / (k*T))

where $\Delta E$ is the energy gap between the coherent state and the thermal ground state. This connects coherence to the Boltzmann distribution and explains why macroscopic quantum coherence is rare at high temperatures.

4.3 Coherence and the Arrow of Time

The entropy-coherence reciprocity provides a new perspective on the arrow of time:

In the thermodynamic direction: entropy increases, coherence decreases
In the biological direction: coherence is maintained at the cost of environmental entropy production
In the cosmological direction: the initial low-entropy state corresponds to a high-coherence initial condition

5. Fluctuation Theorems

5.1 Crooks-Coherence Theorem

The Crooks fluctuation theorem generalizes to include coherence:

P(deltaS + k* delta ln C = A) / P(deltaS + k* delta ln C = -A) = exp(A / k*T)

This ensures that even at the microscopic level, the entropy-coherence reciprocity holds statistically.

5.2 Jarzynski-Coherence Equality

The Jarzynski equality becomes:

<exp(-(W - deltaF) / (k*T))> = <exp(k* delta ln C / (k*T))>

connecting non-equilibrium work measurements to coherence changes.

6. Implications

6.1 Quantum Heat Engines

FRC-consistent quantum heat engines can extract work from coherence:

W_extracted = k*T delta ln C    (maximum, reversible limit)

This provides a new resource for quantum thermodynamic protocols.

6.2 Biological Systems

Living systems maintain coherence ($C > 0$) far from thermal equilibrium by continuously producing entropy. The FRC framework quantifies this:

dS_env/dt >= k* |d ln C_bio/dt|

This sets a minimum metabolic rate for maintaining biological coherence.

!Biological Coherence

7. Proof of Second Law Compliance

7.1 Formal Statement

Theorem: Under FRC dynamics, the total generalized entropy $S_{total} = S_{sys} + S_{env} - k^ \ln C$ is non-decreasing for any process. Proof sketch:
The Lambda-field dynamics conserve $S_{total}$ for reversible processes (by reciprocity)

Irreversible processes add $\Delta S_{irr} \geq 0$ (from standard thermodynamics)

The FRC perturbation to the Hamiltonian is Hermitian (energy-conserving)

Therefore $\Delta S_{total} = \Delta S_{irr} \geq 0$ for all processes

7.2 No Perpetual Motion

FRC does not enable:
Type 1: Energy is conserved (Hermitian Lambda-field dynamics)

Type 2: Entropy-coherence reciprocity prevents coherence extraction without entropy cost

Type 3: Friction and decoherence set irreversible minimum work

8. Conclusion

The FRC framework is fully consistent with the laws of thermodynamics. The Lambda-field and coherence dynamics introduce a new thermodynamic variable ($C$) with a well-defined entropy cost ($-k^ \ln C$), a generalized free energy ($G = H - TS - k^*T \ln C$), and fluctuation theorems that reduce to standard results when $C = 1$. No perpetual motion machines are possible within FRC.

Connections

FRC-566-001 — Formal reciprocity law and UCC derivation
FRC-100-003 — Collapse as dissipative phase-locking
FRC-100-007 — Lambda-field Lagrangian (energy-conserving formulation)

References

Jarzynski, C. (1997). Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences. Physical Review Letters, 78(14), 2690.

Crooks, G. E. (1999). Entropy production fluctuation theorem. Physical Review E, 60(3), 2721.

Esposito, M., et al. (2009). Nonequilibrium fluctuations, fluctuation theorems, and counting statistics in quantum systems. Reviews of Modern Physics, 81(4), 1665.

Landauer, R. (1961). Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 5(3), 183-191.

Linked from