Skip to main content
FRC.v2
|
|
FRC-100-010

Foundational Questions in Fractal Resonance Coherence

Hadi Servat2025-11-209 minFRC 100 seriesFoundational
DOI10.5281/zenodo.17982555PDFDownload
faqphilosophyontologyobjectionsfalsifiability

Reading status

Current statement

An early foundational FAQ retained under its living FRC 100 identifier. Its ontology and quantum-foundation answers are revision pending and not current technical conclusions.

Evidence level

Living core preprint

revision pending

Open boundary

Review the paper’s declared scope, controls, limitations, and kill conditions.

Version lineage

Current release · Current release

On this page
An early foundational FAQ retained under its living FRC 100 identifier. Its ontology and quantum-foundation answers are revision pending and not current technical conclusions.
Cover art for FRC-100-010: Foundational Questions in Fractal Resonance Coherence

Linked from

Related

Paper

Quantum Foundations in the FRC Framework

An early interpretive overview retained under its living FRC 100 identifier. Its ontology comparisons and deterministic framing are revision pending and are not current technical conclusions.

Paper

Fractal Resonance Coherence: A Framework for Complex Systems Analysis

An early framework formulation retained under its living FRC 100 identifier. Its broad deterministic and cross-domain claims are revision pending; it is not the current statement of the program.

Paper

Coherence in Chaos: Diffusion, Localization, and Decoherence in the Standard Map / Quantum Kicked Rotor Family

FRC 100.002 v2.6 preserves the Standard Map / Quantum Kicked Rotor chaos program, the KAM-structure functional, localization/decoherence pilots, the Ruelle-Pollicott negative result, and the demoted stadium appendix. It records the completed registered dense classical Gate 4 test as a negative result: fine KAM-area tracking fails, while the earlier coarse zero-parameter magnitude correspondence survives in its scoped form. This route does not promote the paper as a pillar. The canonical reciprocity law remains dS + k* d ln C = 0. In this paper's declared information-nat realization k*_{mu_nat}=1, and J_sys=d[S_sys,mu+k*_{mu_nat} ln C_mu]/dt remains a system-only diagnostic, not automatically entropy production or a boundary residual.

Paper

The Emergence of the Born Rule from Resonant Equilibrium

An early proposed route to Born-rule behaviour, retained under its living FRC 100 identifier. The derivation and its claimed physical consequences are revision pending, not established results.

Paper

The Lambda-Field v3.3: Narrow Rho-Drift Audit and Ontology Separation

FRC 100.007 v3.3 preserves the narrow audit of the printed rho-level Lambda drift and removes the unsupported replacement ontology. The printed term is not trace preserving in general. The tested anticommutator completion is trace preserving and positive in the sampled qubit trajectories, but two tested coherence functionals move populations away from their initial Born weights and an ensemble-member extension is decomposition dependent. These findings exclude those implementations in the tested regime; they are not a no-go theorem for every rho-level, stochastic, instrument-level, or linear-unconditioned construction. Microstate-distribution dynamics remains one candidate route, conditional on operational equivalence and bipartite no-signaling. The paper distinguishes Lambda_obs, Lambda_eq, and optional Lambda_dyn; a fundamental field is a separate conjecture. Version 3.3 restores the canonical/operational reciprocity notation without changing the audit.