Skip to main content
FRC.v2
FRC-100-003 · v3.3

Collapse as Open-System Phase-Locking v3.3: A Conditional Basin Mechanism

H. Servat2026-07-0912 minFRC 100 seriesFoundationalμ1 Physical / atomic

Reading status

Current statement

Collapse as basin relaxation remains a testable candidate. The pilot is conditional on inserted Born weights, and the microstate realization still owes operational-equivalence, no-signaling, and environment-accounting proofs.

Evidence level

Pilot-supported program

preprint

Declared μ register

μ1 · Physical / atomic

Atoms, fields, quantum systems, thermodynamics, and other physical observables.

Open boundary

Operational equivalence, no-signaling, and environment accounting remain open.

Version lineage

Supersedes: FRC 100.003 v3.2

On this page
FRC 100.003 v3.3 presents finite-time phase-locking into coherence basins as a candidate collapse mechanism, not an established ontology. The pilot checks a Langevin microstate-distribution flow conditional on a stipulated Born-weighted landscape; it does not derive the Born weights. The microstate route remains admissible only if operationally equivalent preparations give identical observable predictions and a bipartite extension passes no-signaling. SME, system-plus-bath, and other norm-controlled realizations remain open alternatives. The paper distinguishes Lambda_obs, observation-derived Lambda_eq, and optional latent Lambda_dyn; a fundamental field is a separate conjecture. The canonical reciprocity law is dS + k* d ln C = 0; this paper uses a predeclared indexed realization only for its local ledger. Boundary-relative lambda=-d_eS is neither imposed universally nor rejected by fiat. The three gates remain open: admissible dynamics, Born-weight origin, and explicit environment accounting.
Cover art for FRC-100-003: Collapse as Open-System Phase-Locking v3.3: A Conditional Basin Mechanism